Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Abhorring Violence

My philosophy may be hard to explain because there is an abhorrence of physical aggression that is also compounded with a fear of hitting back at a bully. A lot of us have experienced hitting a bully only to be pounced on by several other bullies. A lot more of us believe that's what's going to happen. In fact most of the time the bullies scatter and stay away when someone hits back.

It's good that the more human, more normal, "nicer" side of the animal rights controversy abhors violence. We are the mainstream of humanity. We are almost everyone. Almost everyone hates to be violent even in self-defense.

The abhorrence of violence can be taken too far. If you're not willing to wring the neck of the little cretin who set your house on fire, twice, that might be taking a reluctance to be violent too far. That's saying that your home and family are not worth fighting for. By default that supports people who hate you and who would murder your children.

This is not a difficult problem. It's not new, either. In some form or another there have always been sneaky little cowards who would sneak into people's homes and steal and break things. There have always been small groups of people in every town who would form little gangs and believe that they stole and vandalized for some kind of high moral purpose. The humane movement allows just one easy moral loophole. Nothing else like it exists. The same moral loophole that allows these gangs to terrorize medical researchers also allows them to steal your dog and sell it, to allow deer to starve to death instead of being cleanly culled, to raise the price of your food that you can barely afford to buy now, and to inflict a whole host of other miseries on the human race.

The recent BB gun assault against animal rights demonstrators may be deplorable. I don't waste sympathy on people who want a law that mandates spaying and neutering of all pets in the state of California. I have even less than no sympathy when I know that this same group is strongly connected with exploding cars in Los Angeles. The demonstration was a gang action by a terrorist group targeting a legal business. People need to cross that picket line and make a point of attending the targeted store and buying things and the owner of the store has a legitimate need for self defense if the picketing interferes with his legal business.

Nothing dispels intimidation like doing something that scatters a crowd of cowardly terrorists. I'm laughing at the whining of Judie Mancuso about being shot at with BBs. This really doesn't match up against someone's car exploding in his driveway, or someone's house on fire, or millions of dollars in research being destroyed by a bunch of little jerks who are no better than the neighborhood troublemakers who steal your DVD player and scatter flour all over your kitchen.

They do a few things that intimidate people from doing so much as contradicting them. They seem to form an impenetrable shield, but when this shield is broken they are so screwed. They're peeing their pants right now, afraid that real bullets are next. This puts us in a better position to deal with them politically because we wake up and realize that we are dealing with impotent cowards rather than a political juggernaut. They've lived by undermining society way too long. It's time to take it all away from them.


  1. You see, the most concise way to say it is that we need to be able to see animal rights protesters as vulnerable. We need to feel as if things that we do against them have an effect. A misinformed and poorly trained kind of conscience leads us to believe that we shouldn't even look for vulnerabilities, as if it wouldn't be a "fair fight."

    I have seen their vandalism, their violence, and their verbal abuse as vulnerabilities. What kind of magic makes it so that so many people don't seem to see that, except if our side is being too nice to them? It's too easy to get in the habit of seeing zealots as some kind of noble, if misguided warriors. Watching them demonstrate physical cowardice helps kill that delusion. People who are brave enough to blow up cars and shout down people who are trying to access their own government get all teary-eyed and whiny when a tiny bit of flak comes their way. Sneaking into laboratories and setting fires is actually the height of cowardice. Does it really take someone firing BBs at them or throwing water balloons at them to make us see it? When I myself know better, did it take this to really feel, inside, that I'm dealing with lame cowards who go incontinent when they face opposition in kind.

    Normal people might only deign to fight back with relatively harmless weaponry like water balloons and consider it to generally be beneath our dignity. Maybe it actually requires some show, some actual physical street theater, to demonstrate to ourselves and everyone else that first, we do feel entitled to fight back and that we are not intimidated, and second, we are strong enough that we use the absolute minimum amount of force. At least this way we show up.

  2. Please do not get me wrong for saying this because I do not wish violence upon anyone on this earth.
    But, having said this I do believe in KARMA!

    I have met Ms. Mancuso a few times in my meanderings through our justice/legal system, and she definitely has a "Black" aura.
    Self perpetuated of course through her devious actions and pious attitude's.
    Sort of like the character in the Lil' Abner cartoons who walked around with a dark storm cloud hanging over his head all the time. ;-(

    Great pondering' and insight on your writing here Tom, and thanks for your comment over at the Native Hunt Blog, would like to have you back more often!
    T. Michael

  3. I don't wish violence but animal breeders have a right to defend themselves.

    People have to catch wise to the fact that it is like you said, T. Michael. The people who pretend to love the animals and then do all this stuff that is detrimental to the animals are angry, evil, and twisted. They've been getting far too much slack for playing the "environment" and "animal" cards because people aren't thinking.